Some people — perhaps who haven’t been there – tend to speak of Venice with disdain. “Anymore, it’s just a theme park,” they say, as if going there were not a proper foreign vacation. They want to experience a foreign culture as “the locals” do (assuming that’s even remotely possible for an American traveling abroad as a tourist, unaccompanied by any local.) So rubbing shoulders with other tourists is kin to cavorting with lepers.
In some ways, the comparison to a theme park is apt: Venice is host to 18 million tourists annually; just about the same as Disney World or Disneyland. And as you wander through the narrow, cobbled streets — jostling for space with hundreds of other tourists like yourself or dodging gaggles of poorly chaperoned groups of adolescents on school trips — you just might feel as though you’ve entered the Italy Pavilion in the World Showcase part of Epcot Center.
The ridiculous and historically ignorant part of this dismissal of Venice is the “anymore” bit, as if only recently did Venice acquire tourist-central status. I feel compelled to set the record straight.
Venice reached its geo-political and economic zenith sometime in the 1400′s. Two events at the end of that century planted the seeds for the beginning of its eventual decline as a maritime trading power.
In 1492, Columbus “discovered” the New World, paving the way for the Atlantic-facing powers — England, France, Spain, Portugal and the Netherlands — to exploit its natural resources to their enrichment and aggrandisement. And between 1497 and 1499, Vasco da Gama made his way to India and back, opening up another trade route for goods from the East, which previously had been Venice’s near-monopoly as the dominant power in the eastern Mediterranean.
By the 1700′s — the last century of Venice’s independence as a city-state — Venice had become the Las Vegas of its day, at least for Europe’s aristocracy. It was the vice and pleasure capital of Europe, frequented for the liberal availability of gambling and prostitution. Carnival lasted as much as six months, and the nobility wore masks year-round, just for the illicit fun of it.
Today, Venice caters to other vices for the decidedly more middle-class. Sure, you can get a bit of a frisson from the endless array of paintings of hunky martyrs. (Sebastian is practically the patron saint of gay men: who doesn’t love a pretty boy with his hands bound and a few arrows in him?)

Detail of St. Sebastian, Altarpiece of St. Ambrose, Basilica di Santa Maria Gloriosa dei Frari, Venice
And then, of course, there is gelato. Twice daily is barely sufficient. (Incomprehensibly, it’s not served on the breakfast buffet.) I say, go for three anyway. You can always atone for it with a brisk self-flagellation in your hotel room afterwards.
But for all it’s Disneyesque, theme park qualities, Venice lacks that most desirable of Disney traits — fierce but smiling efficiency. The Italians are, of course, infamous for their overly complex and utterly inefficient bureaucracy. (Sorry, miei amici, but it’s true.)
I won’t get into the incomprehensible vaporetto system (getting onto it is challenge enough.) But if ever there were a transportation system that actually encouraged scofflaw fare-beaters, this is it.
My favorite example from our trip, however, was our first attempt to see the Basilica di San Marco, arguably the one sight that everyone who visits Venice sees and has seen for at least the past few centuries — plenty of time to work out a reliable system. (You’ll notice the word attempt – as in “unsuccessful result” — in that last sentence.)
We thought we’d be smart and hit it early in the morning before the line became obnoxiously long. So shortly after 9:00am, we hustled to the Piazza San Marco. Even at that hour, a line had already formed, as it does every single day. We happily joined it.
We waited perhaps 15-20 minutes, and then the line began to move, slowly but steadily. We approached the building. We marveled at the mosaics above the exterior archways. We entered the covered arcade and snaked down the length of it. Looking ahead, it seemed that the line was moving toward what appeared to be a gift shop. I kept looking to see where we branched off into the Basilica itself.
We didn’t. When we reached the head of the line, we were standing in front of the gift shop with the handful of other confused tourists who’d been waiting in front of us. A lone security guard — who seemed surprised and annoyed that people would pepper him with questions — abstractedly explained that the church was closed that morning for services until about noon.
I guess that was the first time in the past nine hundred years since the Basilica was built that it had been closed at a time it was normally open.
Despite this addled operations management, we tourists come in throngs: 55,000 tourists on average each day, meaning quite a few more on peak days. The number becomes quite meaningful in the light of one recent government announcement.
In June of this year, the permanent resident population of the islands of the historic city dropped to below 60,000 — 59,984 to be precise. That’s the lowest count since sometime before 1171 AD when, with 66,000 souls, Venice was one of the three most populous cities in Europe.
For context, that puts Venice on a par with such burgeoning metropolises as Petaluma, CA (59,958); Salisbury, MD (59,426); and ironically — Rome. That’s Rome, GA at 58,287. It’s also about the size of West Palm Beach, Florida when my family moved there in 1962.
The population of Venice reached its peak in the late 15th to 16th centuries at around 180,000. It was drastically reduced by plagues on several occasions after that. It hovered around 140,000 well into modern days. As late as 1951, it had returned to above 170,000.
In 1966, the year of the great flood, there were 120,000 inhabitants, and the population has continued to decline ever since. Rising rents juxtaposed with better-paying, more diversified career opportunities on the mainland are the primary culprits: the economics of being a “local” in Venice no longer make much sense.
I make light of Veniceland, tourist attraction par excellence. But its peril is real and rises not just with the rising waters of the Venetian lagoon. Having built their city originally as a haven from barbarian hordes and protected by its shallow surrounding waters, today the natives are besieged daily by tourist hordes who arrive by train, bus, car, vaporetto and private water taxi to eat gelato in the Piazza San Marco, ride in a gondola, buy glass and carnival masks, and take in some cultchah.
If global warming doesn’t drown it, how will Venice survive as a living city, if it will?
No one seems to know.



















